The Seahawks' Running Back Dilemma: A Draft Strategy Deep Dive
The NFL Draft is a fascinating exercise in balancing potential, value, and need. For the Seattle Seahawks in 2026, the running back position is a particularly intriguing puzzle. With just four picks, every selection must be strategic, and the running back position—often undervalued in the modern NFL—requires a nuanced approach. Personally, I think this is where the Seahawks’ draft strategy will truly be tested. It’s not just about finding talent; it’s about finding the right talent at the right time.
The Round 1 Temptation: Jadarian Price
Let’s start with Jadarian Price, the Notre Dame standout. On paper, he’s a tantalizing prospect—a tempo-driven back with elite vision and a knack for finding the end zone. What makes this particularly fascinating is how his running style echoes Kenneth Walker III, a player who’s been a game-changer for Seattle. But here’s the catch: Price is far from a sure thing in Round 1. His limited third-down value and lack of top-end speed raise questions about his ceiling.
In my opinion, drafting Price in the first round would be a risky move. The Seahawks don’t pick again until 64, and with such a long gap, they’d be better off addressing more pressing needs early. What this really suggests is that the running back position, while important, isn’t worth overextending for in Round 1. It’s a classic case of chasing traits over value, and I’d argue that’s a mistake.
Round 2: The Sweet Spot
If you take a step back and think about it, Round 2 is where the Seahawks could strike gold. Mike Washington Jr. from Arkansas is a name that immediately stands out. He’s a traits-based projection with impressive speed and fluidity, but his hesitation at the line and ball security issues are red flags. Still, his physical tools and growth trajectory make him a solid bet for a rotational back with upside.
Then there’s Jonah Coleman, a player who visited Seattle pre-draft. Coleman is the kind of back who does the little things right—smart, disciplined, and reliable. What many people don’t realize is that his lack of elite speed is offset by his understanding of run schemes and pass protection. He’s not a home-run hitter, but he’s the kind of player who could step into a three-down backup role early on. From my perspective, Coleman is the kind of value pick that makes sense in Round 2.
Round 3 and Beyond: Finding Role Players
By Round 3, the focus shifts to players who can fill specific roles. Emmett Johnson from Nebraska is a gap-scheme specialist who runs with urgency and decisiveness. He’s not the flashiest back, but his consistency and pass-catching ability make him a solid option. One thing that immediately stands out is how well he fits into a structured offense, which could be a perfect match for Seattle’s system.
Late-round picks like Adam Randall (Clemson) and Chip Trayanum (Toledo) are where things get interesting. Randall, a former wide receiver, is raw but has the size and speed to develop into a mismatch nightmare. Trayanum, a former linebacker, brings physicality and pass protection skills that could carve out a niche role. These are the kinds of developmental bets that could pay off big if they pan out.
The Bigger Picture: Drafting in the Modern NFL
What this draft class really highlights is the evolving role of the running back in the NFL. Teams are increasingly hesitant to invest high picks in the position, and for good reason. The shelf life of a running back is shorter than other positions, and impact players can often be found in the middle rounds. This raises a deeper question: Are teams better off drafting running backs as role players rather than stars?
In my opinion, the Seahawks should lean into this trend. Targeting a reliable back in Round 2 or 3 while using late picks on developmental projects feels like the most efficient strategy. It maximizes value, maintains roster flexibility, and aligns with the modern NFL’s approach to the position.
Final Thoughts: A Thoughtful Approach
The Seahawks’ running back dilemma isn’t just about who they draft—it’s about when and why. Jadarian Price might be tempting, but he’s a Round 1 reach. Mike Washington Jr. and Jonah Coleman offer better value in Round 2, while later picks like Randall and Trayanum provide upside without the risk.
If you ask me, the key is patience. The Seahawks don’t need a superstar running back; they need players who fit their system and contribute in specific ways. By focusing on value and role-fitting, they can build a strong backfield without sacrificing their draft capital.
What this really suggests is that the Seahawks’ success in 2026 won’t be defined by a single pick, but by their ability to think strategically across all rounds. And that, in my opinion, is what makes this draft so compelling.
